He was a believer in equality, and a critic of class who founded his later work on a deep assumption of inherent inequality, inescapable class difference (p. He was a socialist, who popularized a severe and damaging criticism of the idea of socialism and of its adherents. But there are other, more particular, paradoxes. These, perhaps, are elements of the general paradox. He was a humane man who communicated an extreme of inhuman terror a man committed to decency who actualized a distinctive squalor. The total effect of Orwell’s work is an effect of a paradox. In the last chapter of Culture and Society (1958), devoted to the work of the celebrated English novelist and essayist George Orwell, Raymond Williams wrote:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |